Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/897
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ulutaş, Murat | - |
dc.contributor.author | Özkaya, Mustafa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yaman, Onur | - |
dc.contributor.author | Demir, Teyfik | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-29T14:05:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-29T14:05:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ulutaş, M., Özkaya, M., Yaman, O., & Demir, T. (2018). Do we need a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage to increase the stability of functional spinal unit when comparing unilateral and bilateral fixation?. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 232(7), 655-664. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0954-4119 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411918783779 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/897 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was an alternative to posterior lumbar interbody fusion for decompression surgeries. This study investigates the biomechanical responses of the unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixations with/without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cages under axial compression, flexion, and torsional loads. Ovine vertebrae were used in this study. Cadavers, randomly divided into five, were intact control group, bilateral pedicle screw fixation group, bilateral pedicle screw fixation group with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage, unilateral pedicle screw fixation group, and unilateral pedicle screw fixation group with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage. Axial compression, flexion, and torsion tests were performed on specimens. All study groups provided higher stiffness and yield load values than control group under axial compression. Addition of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage to bilateral fixation increased the stiffness under axial compression. Moreover, additional use of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in unilateral fixation increased the yield load values under axial compression. Control group was the stiffest in flexion test. Placing a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage to both unilateral and bilateral fixations did not significantly change the stiffness values. Additional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage increased the yield moment of the bilateral fixation. In torsion test, control group had the highest stiffness and yield torque. The facet joints are the most important parts of the vertebrae on the stability. When comparing the bilateral and unilateral fixations with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion addition, the more facet preserving approach has significantly higher stability under axial compression, flexion, and torsion. Unilateral fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage can be said biomechanically stable and advantageous fixation system because of the advantage on the less facet and soft tissue resection compared to bilateral fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Bilateral fixation | en_US |
dc.subject | unilateral fixation | en_US |
dc.subject | transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion | en_US |
dc.title | Do we need a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage to increase the stability of functional spinal unit when comparing unilateral and bilateral fixation? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.department | Faculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering | en_US |
dc.department | Fakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 232 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 655 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 664 | |
dc.authorid | Demir, Teyfik [0000-0001-6352-8302] | - |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000438608300002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85049018014 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Demir, Teyfik | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 29923451 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0954411918783779 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0954411918783779 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | Demir, Teyfik [3488228600] | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
Appears in Collections: | Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
checked on Sep 7, 2024
Page view(s)
60
checked on Sep 9, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.