Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8858
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBayraktaroglu M.-
dc.contributor.authorKurtay A.-
dc.contributor.authorHorasanli E.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T19:22:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-30T19:22:09Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1128-3602-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202206_29068-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8858-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed interventional endoscopic procedures for diagnosis and treatment. During the procedure, the increase in intraabdominal pressure can cause undesirable spikes in intraocular pressure. In the literature, there are no studies on agent combinations that cause the least effect on intraocular pressure and hemodynamic response in colonoscopic procedures, which are performed more frequently in the elderly, the patient group at the greatest risk for glaucoma. This study aimed to compare ketamine-propofol and ketamine-midazolam protocols in terms of their effects on hemodynamic parameters and intraocular pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research was a randomized clinical controlled double-blind study. The study was conducted on 60 healthy adults who underwent elective colonoscopy. Ketamin-midazolam and ketamine-propofol combinations were used. Hemodynamic parameters, intraocular pressures at five different times, and the satisfaction levels of the endoscopist and the patient were recorded. RESULTS: In both groups, there was a statistically significant difference between the pre-procedure intraocular pressure values and the values at the 1st minute of the procedure and at recovery (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the intraocular pressure values of the study groups at any time point (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both combinations can be used safely. The combination of ketamine and propofol in subanesthetic doses provides better sedation without disturbing the hemodynamics and is preferable. © 2022 Verduci Editore s.r.l. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVerduci Editore s.r.len_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectColonoscopyen_US
dc.subjectIntraocular pressureen_US
dc.subjectKetamineen_US
dc.subjectSedationen_US
dc.subjectketamineen_US
dc.subjectmidazolamen_US
dc.subjectpropofolen_US
dc.subjecthypnotic sedative agenten_US
dc.subjectketamineen_US
dc.subjectmidazolamen_US
dc.subjectpropofolen_US
dc.subjectabdominal painen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectanesthesia levelen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectblood pressureen_US
dc.subjectbody massen_US
dc.subjectbradycardiaen_US
dc.subjectcancer screeningen_US
dc.subjectclinical protocolen_US
dc.subjectcolonen_US
dc.subjectcolonoscopyen_US
dc.subjectconstipationen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdiarrheaen_US
dc.subjectdouble blind procedureen_US
dc.subjectdrug safetyen_US
dc.subjectelective surgeryen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthemodynamicsen_US
dc.subjecthepatic flexureen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjecthypertensionen_US
dc.subjecthypotensionen_US
dc.subjecthypoxiaen_US
dc.subjectileocecal valveen_US
dc.subjectintraocular pressureen_US
dc.subjectiron deficiency anemiaen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectnauseaen_US
dc.subjectoccult blooden_US
dc.subjectpatient positioningen_US
dc.subjectpatient satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectpreoperative perioden_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjecttachycardiaen_US
dc.subjectvomitingen_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectcolonoscopyen_US
dc.subjecteye diseaseen_US
dc.subjecthemodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectintraocular pressureen_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial (topic)en_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectColonoscopyen_US
dc.subjectEye Diseasesen_US
dc.subjectHemodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectHypnotics and Sedativesen_US
dc.subjectIntraocular Pressureen_US
dc.subjectKetamineen_US
dc.subjectMidazolamen_US
dc.subjectPropofolen_US
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicen_US
dc.titleComparison of Two Sedation Protocols on Intraocular Pressure and Hemodynamic Responses During Colonoscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage4295en_US
dc.identifier.endpage4302en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134083840en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35776030en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.26355/eurrev_202206_29068-
dc.authorscopusid56079758000-
dc.authorscopusid56119727600-
dc.authorscopusid12800485900-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
dc.ozel2022v3_Editen_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

72
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.