Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/7252
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÜlger, Ayşe Füsun-
dc.contributor.authorPoyraz, Barış-
dc.contributor.authorBalbay, Ege Güleç-
dc.contributor.authorBinay, Songül-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-11T15:56:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-11T15:56:07Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.issn1940-5901-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/7252-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the patients' attitudes about the devices, of which they use for long-term respiratory support at home. Method: 200 consecutive patients were questioned about the treatment and devices of respiratory support at home by face to face questionnaire. Their records were taken from the archives of Social Security Agency. Results: 123 (61.5%) of the patients were men and 77 (38.5%) were women. The mean age was 65.8 +/- 11.9 (15-92) years. The most frequently prescribed device was oxygen concentrator and BIPAP was the one that follows. The most common indications were hypoxic and hypercapnic respiratory failure due to COPD. The devices were prescribed by the state university hospitals, most commonly. The average daily oxygen usage duration was 16.3 +/- 3.1 hours, the average duration was 7.4 +/- 3.1 hours, for BIPAP. Twenty one (11.4%) of the patients, who were treated with LTOT, stated that they were taking oxygen less than 15 hours a day. Higher education levels of the patients was correlated with the higher rates of visiting the companies - that they bought the devices-both for information about and control of the devices (p=0.002). The rate of visiting companies/firms was significantly higher in patients, who use BIPAP and respiratory support combined with it (p=0.010). Twenty three (47.9%) of the 48 patients, who notified that their devices were impaired, waited for repairment by the firm, 20 (41.6%) investigated special repair facilities and the rest (10.5%) rented a new device. Conclusion: Effective and continuous technical maintenance support must be provided to the patients, who are treated with long-term respiratory support at home.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE-Century Publishing Corpen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Clinical And Experimental Medicineen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOxygen concentratorsen_US
dc.subjectnoninvasive mechanical ventilationen_US
dc.titleOur Experience of 200 Patients: Usage and Maintenance of Long-Term Oxygen Therapy and Non-Invasive Ventilation Devices at Home [article]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage170en_US
dc.identifier.endpage176en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-1557-7019-
dc.authorid0000-0002-5712-2127-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000333151200021en_US
dc.institutionauthorPoyraz, Barış Mustafa-
dc.identifier.pmid24482704en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü / Department of Internal Medical Sciences
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

60
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.