Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/5638
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaraballo E.-
dc.contributor.authorKasnakoğlu, Coşku-
dc.contributor.authorSerrania A.-
dc.contributor.authorSamimyl M.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-11T15:19:27Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-11T15:19:27Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-1452-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2514/1.35428-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/5638-
dc.description.abstractFirst-principle-based models of the dynamics of flow systems are often of limited use for model-based control design, not only because of their nonlinear and infinite-dimensional nature, but also because the control input is generally specified as a boundary condition. Proper orthogonal decomposition and Galerkin projection are among the most effective and commonly used methods to obtain reduced-order models of flow dynamics. However, the final form of these models may not account for the presence of a forcing or control input. From a control design perspective, it is desirable to obtain a reduced-order model in which the control input appears explicitly in the dynamic equations. In this paper, two methods for control input separation are introduced and comparatively evaluated in experimentally based reduced-order modeling of cavity flow, both in their ability to reconstruct the forced flowfleld and to provide models suitable for feedback control design. The proposed methods, namely, 1) actuated proper orthogonal decomposition expansion and 2) ?2 optimization, extend the baseline flow model through the use of innovation vectors, which capture the deviation of the actuated flow from the baseline space. The new methods address some of the issues associated with the subdomain separation technique employed in our previous works. Linear-quadratic regulator controllers, built using models obtained from the new methods, have been tested on a cavity flow experiment. Although the new models perform satisfactorily and comparably to our previous models in terms of suppression of cavity tones, they offer a substantial advantage in terms of the required input power to achieve a similar or better performance. Copyright © 2008 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAir Force Office of Scientific Research: F33615-01-2-3154en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAIAA Journalen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleControl Input Separation Methods for Reduced-Order Model-Based Feedback Flow Controlen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineeringen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Elektrik ve Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume46en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2306en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2322en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-51749091330en_US
dc.institutionauthorKasnakoğlu, Coşku-
dc.identifier.doi10.2514/1.35428-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept02.5. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Elektrik ve Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on Sep 24, 2022

Page view(s)

80
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.