Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/5596
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAn J.-
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Erdem-
dc.contributor.authorHaftka R. T.-
dc.contributor.authorKim N. H.-
dc.contributor.authorIfju P. G.-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson T. F.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-11T15:19:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-11T15:19:20Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-8669-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2514/1.35551-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/5596-
dc.description.abstractIn aircraft structural design, failure stresses are obtained from coupon tests and then used to predict failure under combined loads in structural elements. Structural element tests are next used to update the failure envelope for combined loads. It is a common practice to repeat the element tests and then select the lowest test result as a conservative estimate of the mean failure stress. This practice is equivalent to reducing the average test failure stress by a knockdown factor (one that is quite variable). Instead, we propose using the average test result with an explicit knockdown factor obtained from statistical distribution of the test data. We show reductions in the variability of the estimated mean failure stress as well as the likelihood of unconservative estimate. In addition, when the initial distribution or confidence interval of the mean failure stresses is available, we can further decrease the chance of unconservative estimate using Bayesian updating. We demonstrate the gains associated with Bayesian updating when the upper and lower bounds of errors in the analytical predictions are available. Examples with uniform and lognormal distributions of failure stresses compare the lowest-result approach with the two alternatives with the explicit knockdown factor. Both approaches significantly reduce the likelihood of unconservative estimates of the mean failure stress. The average approach reduced this likelihood by about a half and the Bayesian approach by up to an order of magnitude (from 12.5 to 1 % ). We also examine scenarios in which estimates of error and variability are substantially inaccurate. We show that, even then, the likelihood of unconservative estimates reduces significantly. Remarkably, an underestimate of variability also results in about a 2% higher average of the estimated mean failure stress. Thus, we are able to simultaneously use higher average failure stress (leading to lower weight) and reduce the likelihood of unconservative estimates.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipLangley Research Center: NNX08AC33A Air Force Research Laboratory: FA9550-07-1-0018 U.S. Air Forceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Aircraften_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleBeing Conservative With a Limited Number of Test Resultsen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1969en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1975en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-57649136680en_US
dc.institutionauthorAcar, Erdem-
dc.identifier.doi10.2514/1.35551-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept02.7. Department of Mechanical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

26
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on Sep 24, 2022

Page view(s)

88
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.