Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3921
Title: Concerns of Pregnant Women in Prenatal Screening/Diagnosis Practice and Termination of Pregnancy
Authors: Tarı Kasnakoğlu, Berna
Çakar, Mehmet
Ökem, Zeynep Güldem
Tanacan, Atakan
Fadıloğlu, Erdem
Örgül, Gökçen
Beksaç, Mehmet Sinan
Keywords: antenatal care
pregnancy
prenatal diganostics
Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag
Source: Kasnakoglu, B. T., Cakar, M., Okem, Z. G., Tanacan, A., Fadiloglu, E., Orgul, G., & Beksac, M. S. (2020). Concerns of Pregnant Women in “Prenatal Screening/Diagnosis” Practice and Termination of Pregnancy. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie, 224(03), 136-142.
Abstract: Objective To investigate the reasons for decision-making and concerns of patients in the field of prenatal screening, invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (IPDT), and termination of pregnancy (TOP). Study Design This questionnaire-based study consisted of 107 pregnant women who were referred for prenatal screening to the Hacettepe University Hospital. The questionnaire given to patients was prepared from scratch since there is no standard set of questions measuring patients' feelings and concerns regarding prenatal screening/diagnosis, IPDT, and TOP. Results Our questionnaire results showed that it is possible to classify decision-making factors into 6 groups: psychological, social, fear, religious/faith, support, and trust. The majority of patients were undecided (48.6%) about IPDT if prenatal screening test results were risky. Only 23.4% of patients were willing to accept IPDT. On the other hand, 55.1% of patients were not willing to undergo TOP if the fetal karyotyping results were abnormal. Religious factors seem to be important in refusing IPDT and TOP. Conclusion Physicians should re-evaluate their practice in the field of prenatal screening and diagnosis in light of the high refusal rates of IPDT and TOP. Understanding factors influencing women's decision-making processes provides insight for service providers to help women at high risk of having foetal anomalies to make better-informed choices.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3921
https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-1076-1039
ISSN: 0948-2393
Appears in Collections:İşletme Bölümü / Department of Management
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Uluslararası Girişimcilik Bölümü / Department of International Entrepreneurship
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

208
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.