Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3844
Title: | CACTUS: Cancer image annotating, calibrating, testing, understanding and sharing in breast cancer histopathology | Authors: | Aksac, A. Özyer, Tansel Demetrick, D. J. Alhajj, Reda |
Keywords: | Annotation breast cancer grading histopathology medical image analysis |
Publisher: | BioMed Central Ltd. | Source: | Aksac, A., Ozyer, T., Demetrick, D. J., and Alhajj, R. (2020). CACTUS: cancer image annotating, calibrating, testing, understanding and sharing in breast cancer histopathology. BMC Research Notes, 13(1), 1-7. | Abstract: | Objective: Develop CACTUS (cancer image annotating, calibrating, testing, understanding and sharing) as a novel web application for image archiving, annotation, grading, distribution, networking and evaluation. This helps pathologists to avoid unintended mistakes leading to quality assurance, teaching and evaluation in anatomical pathology. Effectiveness of the tool has been demonstrated by assessing pathologists performance in the grading of breast carcinoma and by comparing inter/intra-observer assessment of grading criteria amongst pathologists reviewing digital breast cancer images. Reproducibility has been assessed by inter-observer (kappa statistics) and intra-observer (intraclass correlation coefficient) concordance rates. Results: CACTUS has been evaluated using a surgical pathology application - the assessment of breast cancer grade. We used CACTUS to present standardized images to four pathologists of differing experience. They were asked to evaluate all images to determine their assessment of Nottingham grade of a series of breast carcinoma cases. For each image, they were asked for their overall grade impression. CACTUS helps and guides pathologists to improve disease diagnosis with higher confidence and thereby reduces their workload and bias. CACTUS can be useful for both disseminating anatomical pathology images for teaching, as well as for evaluating agreement amongst pathologists or against a gold standard for evaluation or quality assurance. © 2019 The Author(s). | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3844 https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-019-4866-z |
ISSN: | 17560500 |
Appears in Collections: | Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Computer Engineering PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
tansel-ozyer.pdf | 1.61 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Nov 9, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Page view(s)
166
checked on Nov 11, 2024
Download(s)
58
checked on Nov 11, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.