Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3795
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÖzülken, Kemal-
dc.contributor.authorAksoy Aydemir, Gözde-
dc.contributor.authorAydemir, Emre-
dc.contributor.authorKıızltoprak, Hasan-
dc.contributor.authorYüksel, Erdem-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T06:37:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-18T06:37:39Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-
dc.identifier.citationÖzülken, K., Aydemir, G. A., Aydemir, E., Kızıltoprak, H., & Yüksel, E. (2020). Comparison of Two Different Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking Procedure Outcomes in Patients with Keratoconus. Balkan Medical Journal, 37(3), 131.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-3123-
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/373727-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3795-
dc.identifier.urihttp://balkanmedicaljournal.org/abstract.php?id=2177-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Corneal cross-linking treatment is the unique treatment method that can cease the progression of keratoconus disease. Because of the long duration of conventional treatment, accelerated cross-linking treatment methods are being developed. Aims: To compare two different accelerated corneal cross-linking protocols in terms of postoperative visual acuity and topographic findings (higher-order aberrations and keratometry values). Study Design: Retrospective comparative study. Methods: Sixty-five eyes of 43 patients (30 men and 13 women) who underwent two different accelerated corneal cross-linking protocols (10 min, 9 mW/cm2 and 5 min, 18 mW/cm2) for progressive keratoconus were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the accelerated corneal cross-linking treatment protocol: group 1 (10 min, 9 mW/cm2, 32 eyes of 21 patients) and group 2 (5 min, 18 mW/cm2, 33 eyes of 22 patients). Uncorrected visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity values and topographic findings (central corneal thickness and flat and steep keratometry values) were recorded preoperatively and 6 months after corneal cross-linking treatment. High-order aberration values measured with Pentacam preoperatively and 6 months after corneal cross-linking were also recorded. Results: In both groups, a significant improvement was detected in the uncorrected visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity levels preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively (group 1: p=0.001, p=0.001 and group 2: p=0.001, p=0.001, respectively). In addition, central corneal thickness values decreased significantly in both groups (p=0.006 and 0.001). Trefoil values showed no significant difference preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively in group 1 (p=0.160 and 0.620, respectively). In groups 1 and 2, coma values were found to decrease significantly in the 6th postoperative month compared with preoperative values (p=0.001 and 0.020, respectively). There was no significant difference between preoperative and 6th month postoperative horizontal and vertical trefoil values in both groups (p=0.850 and 0.140, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of preoperative and 6th month postoperative higher-order aberrations, refractive errors, keratometry values, and uncorrected visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity levels. Conclusion: Both accelerated corneal cross-linking procedures provide similar improvement in topographic findings, coma values and visual acuity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTrakya University Faculty of Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBalkan Medical Journalen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAccelarated cross-linkingen_US
dc.subjectcomaen_US
dc.subjectcorneal cross-linkinen_US
dc.subjectcx1en_US
dc.subjecthigher-order aberationsen_US
dc.subjectkeratoconusen_US
dc.titleComparison of Two Different Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Procedure Outcomes in Patients With Keratoconusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalıtr_TR
dc.identifier.volume37-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.startpage131-
dc.identifier.endpage137-
dc.authorid0000-0001-9963-7607-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000526082100004en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85083620490en_US
dc.institutionauthorÖzülken, Kemal-
dc.identifier.pmid31909581en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2020.2019.8.45-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
dc.identifier.trdizinidTXpjek56STNOdz09-
dc.identifier.trdizinid373727en_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü / Department of Surgical Sciences
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
3795.pdf530.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Page view(s)

68
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.