Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3778
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuruk, Banu-
dc.contributor.authorEkmekci, Perihan Elif-
dc.contributor.authorArda, Berna-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T06:32:17Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-18T06:32:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBuruk, B., Ekmekci, P. E., & Arda, B. (2020). A critical perspective on guidelines for responsible and trustworthy artificial intelligence. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1386-7423-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3778-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09948-1-
dc.description.abstractArtificial intelligence (AI) is among the fastest developing areas of advanced technology in medicine. The most important qualia of AI which makes it different from other advanced technology products is its ability to improve its original program and decision-making algorithms via deep learning abilities. This difference is the reason that AI technology stands out from the ethical issues of other advanced technology artifacts. The ethical issues of AI technology vary from privacy and confidentiality of personal data to ethical status and value of AI entities in a wide spectrum, depending on their capability of deep learning and scope of the domains in which they operate. Developing ethical norms and guidelines for planning, development, production, and usage of AI technology has become an important issue to overcome these problems. In this respect three outstanding documents have been produced: 1. The Montréal Declaration for Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence 2. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI 3. Asilomar Artificial Intelligence Principles In this study, these three documents will be analyzed with respect to the ethical principles and values they involve, their perspectives for approaching ethical issues, and their prospects for ethical reasoning when one or more of these values and principles are in conflict. Then, the sufficiency of these guidelines for addressing current or prospective ethical issues emerging from the existence of AI technology in medicine will be evaluated. The discussion will be pursued in terms of the ambiguity of interlocutors and efficiency for working out ethical dilemmas occurring in practical life.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine, Health Care and Philosophyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence (AI)en_US
dc.subjectEthics Guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectEthical Valuesen_US
dc.subjectTechnology Ethicsen_US
dc.titleA Critical Perspective on Guidelines for Responsible and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, School of Medicine, Department of Basic Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.startpage387-
dc.identifier.endpage399-
dc.authorid0000-0003-2272-5865-
dc.authorid0000-0002-0777-3861-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000523332900001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85083263088en_US
dc.institutionauthorBuruk, Banu-
dc.institutionauthorEkmekci, Perihan Elif-
dc.identifier.pmid32236794en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11019-020-09948-1-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - İdari Personel ve Öğrencien_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept03.14. Department of Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept03.14. Department of Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü / Department of Basic Medical Sciences
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

23
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

470
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.