Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3246
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPeker, Yaşar Subutay-
dc.contributor.authorHançerlioğullari, Oğuz-
dc.contributor.authorCan, Mehmet Fatih-
dc.contributor.authorDemirbaş, Sezai-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-30T07:28:06Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-30T07:28:06Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPeker, Y. S., Hançerlioğulları, O., Can, M. F., & Demirbaş, S. (2019). Conventional versus endoscopic components separation technique: New anthropometric calculation for selection of surgical approach. Turkish journal of medical sciences, 49(4), 1109-1116.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144-
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/issues/sag-19-49-4/sag-49-4-21-1708-112.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3246-
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: Giant ventral incisional hernias (GVIHs) are hard to manage for surgeons. This problem was resolved in 1990 with the components separation technique (CST). We aimed to compare endoscopic and conventional CST for GVIHs and find a new anthropometric calculation. Materials and methods: In this prospective nonrandomized clinical trial, 21 patients were treated with endoscopic or conventional CST between 2012 and 2016. Eight patients (38.1%) were operated endoscopically and 13 (61.9%) conventionally on the basis of preoperative tomography results, hernia surface area (HSA), number of recent abdominal operations, comorbidities, and the presence or history of ostomy. Groups in which prosthetic material was applied were also compared with groups in which it was not. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between endoscopic and conventional CST groups in terms of complications. A weakly statistically significant difference (P = 0.069) was found between the components separation index (CSI) of mesh-applied and not-applied patients. HSA/body surface area (BSA) was statistically significantly different between endoscopic and conventional CST groups. Conclusion: According to our results, HSA/BSA and CSI are statistically successful for preoperative prediction of mesh placement. Furthermore, HSA/BSA preoperatively successfully predicts whether conventional or endoscopic CST should be used in patients with GVIH.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTUBITAK SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TURKEYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComponents separation indexen_US
dc.subjectcomponents separation techniqueen_US
dc.subjectgiant ventral incisional herniaen_US
dc.subjectGulhane index for components separationen_US
dc.subjectABDOMINAL-WALL RECONSTRUCTION; VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR; WOUND COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; CLOSUREtr_TR
dc.titleConventional Versus Endoscopic Components Separation Technique: New Anthropometric Calculation for Selection of Surgical Approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, School of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume49-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.startpage1109-
dc.identifier.endpage1116-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000480360000021en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85071354110en_US
dc.institutionauthorDemirbaş, Sezai-
dc.identifier.pmid31385485en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3906/sag-1708-112-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept03.14. Department of Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü / Department of Surgical Sciences
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

80
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.