Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/2567
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Mert-
dc.contributor.authorÖztoprak, Aydın-
dc.contributor.authorBerkman, Ali Emre-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-25T12:40:18Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-25T12:40:18Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.isbn9781912294008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/2567-
dc.identifier.urihttp://drslxd19.id.metu.edu.tr/-
dc.description.abstractIndustrial design education is about process rather than product. Design education requires students to follow particular paths for learning design practice during their journey to proposing design solutions. A design studio course is characterized by hands on learning, learning by doing, collaboration, trial and error, peer learning and constructive criticism. Generally, evaluation of student performance is associated with the evaluation of the final design solution. However, the process that generated the final design solution is as important and useful as the final design solution. With project process cards (PPC) we aimed to collect students’ self-reflection during the design process. The gap between students’ self- evaluation of their performance and instructors’ expectations from the students creates confusion in both parties. Project process cards are weekly self-reports that are borrowed from user experience research studies. A digital report template with two main sections, activities and reflection, is provided by the teaching staff. During the study we utilized PPC in 3rd and 4th year industrial design studio courses with a total of 101 students and the students prepared 563 cards. We received positive feedback and acceptance on students’ side, as they used the tool for self-reflection. On the instructors’ side, PPC served as a documentation and communication medium to increase the quality of communication between the students and the instructors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMiddle East Technical University Faculty of Architecture Department of Industrial Designen_US
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of DRS Learn X Design 2019: Insider Knowledgeen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectself-reporten_US
dc.subjectself-assessmenten_US
dc.subjectindustrial design educationen_US
dc.subjectdesign evaluationen_US
dc.titleProject Process Cards: a Self-Evaluation Tool for Design Studioen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Fine Arts Design and Architecture, Department of Industrial Designen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Güzel Sanatlar Tasarım ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage431
dc.identifier.endpage438
dc.institutionauthorTosun, Mert-
dc.institutionauthorÖztoprak, Aydın-
dc.institutionauthorBerkman, Ali Emre-
dc.identifier.doi10.21606/learnxdesign.2019.09125-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept06.03. Department of Industrial Design-
crisitem.author.dept06.03. Department of Industrial Design-
crisitem.author.dept06.03. Department of Industrial Design-
Appears in Collections:Endüstriyel Tasarım Bölümü / Department of Industrial Design
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

222
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.