Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11934
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErdebilli, B.-
dc.contributor.authorCan, R.N.-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, İ.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-10T19:00:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-10T19:00:47Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.isbn978-303097940-9-
dc.identifier.isbn978-303097939-3-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97940-9_101-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11934-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the calculation of analyzing solar energy investment decisions applying Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. With the increasing energy demand all over the world, governments’ policy has changed in recent years to balance the gap between supply and demand. Also, the governments take into consideration decrease external energy dependence by finding alternative energy resources. For this purpose, it is thought that benefitting from renewable energy can be the other alternative solution for balancing the gap between energy demand and supply with low expenses with easy application processes. Solar energy is one of the most preferable renewable energy in the world due to acceptable investment costs and sustainability. Turkey is convenient to set up solar energy power plants in terms of solar energy potential and geographical features. MDCM methods are applied to solve not only basic energy problem but also complex energy management decision problems. For this reason, the purpose of this paper is to decide which area of Turkey would be more appropriate to invest in solar energy power plants by proposing an optimum investment decision plan comparing with the alternative investment fields. To deal with that, 14 important subcriteria in four main criteria (e.g., economic, environmental, technical, and energy) are determined to analyze the investment decision as These criteria are applied in different MDCM methods such as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realité (ELECTRE), and Preference Ranking Organization Method For Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE). By comparing the results of these three methods, the optimum investment decision is determined for the selected districts from Tukey. Also, the solution’s sensitivity is shown with sensitivity analysis. The results of the proposed methods indicate that high flexibility for decision-makers to reach a comprehensive information range for solar energy investment decisions based on real data sets from different sides of Turkey. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHandbook of Smart Energy Systems: Volume 1-4en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAHPen_US
dc.subjectELECTREen_US
dc.subjectMulti-Criteria Decision- Making (MCDM)en_US
dc.subjectPROMETHEEen_US
dc.subjectSolar Energy Resourceen_US
dc.titleAnalyzing the Solar Energy System Investment in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeBook Parten_US
dc.departmentTOBB ETÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume1-4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2653en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2684en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85208306212en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-97940-9_101-
dc.authorscopusid44661946600-
dc.authorscopusid59398345100-
dc.authorscopusid57194944318-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
item.openairetypeBook Part-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

4
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.