Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11279
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuhi Sipahioğlu, Işıl-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-06T08:09:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-06T08:09:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.isbn9786052271421 (1.c)-
dc.identifier.isbn9786052271414 (Tk)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.livenarch.org/index.php?p=pages&id=25-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11279-
dc.description.abstractThe final architectural design studio, mainly known as the diploma/graduation studio, is a threshold before graduation. Students’ graduation projects are the capstone/assemblage/synthesis of their education life. They might also portray an institution's expected graduate profiles. Prior research mapped the habitus/practices, thus in-between mediation activities (methods, processes, and execution) of diploma studios across European Schools of Architecture but has not explored how this habitus affects and influences students’ outputs. To close this gap, this study capitalizes on previous research's categorizing of studio practices to analyze 1531 Archiprix Turkey competition entries and 61 winners from 2014 to 2020. The study code competition entries into university and hometown categories, studio model categories, prize categories, and winning projects based on school assignment strategies for theme/topic/project areas. The coding is then visualized for analysis. The study analyzes the jury comments on winning projects to reveal the correlation between studio practices and jury evaluations. The results indicate that graduates from certain schools, mostly located in İstanbul, Ankara, and İzmir, tend to participate in the competition more often than graduates from other schools. Thus, other(s) geographies/schools are absent from the scene of architectural education in Turkey. The main diploma studio practice consists of assigning building programs and predetermined project areas. Despite this, new niche practices, such as those focused on speculative approaches and requiring students to determine both the location of their project and its architectural or urban program have emerged in recent years and are showing up in competition results.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKaradeniz Technical University Faculty Of Architecture Department Of Architectureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLIVENARCH VII-2021 Livable Environments and Architecture International Congress Replacing Architecture 28-30 September 2021/KTU Trabzon-Turkeyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArchitectural Educationen_US
dc.subjectArchiprix Turkeyen_US
dc.subjectDiploma Studioen_US
dc.subjectGraduation Projecten_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titleOther(s) At The Threshold Of Architectural Education: A Reading Of The Graduation Projects Submitted To The Archiprix Turkey Competition From 2013 To 2020en_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.departmentTOBB ETU Architectureen_US
dc.identifier.startpage1084en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1099en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8994-626X-
dc.institutionauthorRuhi Sipahioğlu, Işıl-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.dept06. Faculty of Architecture and Design-
Appears in Collections:Mimarlık Bölümü / Department of Architecture
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

22
checked on Jul 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.