Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11014
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuruk, B.-
dc.contributor.authorEkmekci, P.E.-
dc.contributor.authorÇelebi, A.S.-
dc.contributor.authorGüneş, B.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-21T09:24:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-21T09:24:34Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn1065-3058-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-023-00476-6-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11014-
dc.description.abstractThis study sought to determine cardiologists’ degrees of ethical awareness and preferred courses of action for ethical dilemmas frequently encountered in clinical settings. For this evaluation, an online survey was created and sent to cardiologists affiliated with various academic posts in Ankara, Turkey. The survey included ten cases with various ethical considerations selected from our book, “Clinic Ethics with Cases from Cardiology.” Four possible action choices were defined for each case. Participants were asked to choose one or more of these preferences. In addition, a fictional change was made in each case’s context without changing the original ethical issue, and participants were asked whether an attitude different from the first chosen one was preferred. The participation ratio was 49/185 (26%), consent ratio 47/185 (25,4%), and completion ratio 44/185 (23,7%). Nine of the ten scenario changes did not change participants’ preferred action. For most questions, action preferences were concentrated between the two options. Although legal regulations did not reduce ethical dilemmas, they clarified physicians’ action preferences. Similarly, as an obscure moral issue gained prominence, physicians were forced to draw clearer lines in their actions. External factors such as healthcare emergencies can change physicians’ ethical dilemma-solving attitudes. © 2024, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Care Analysisen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCardiology; Clinical ethics; Ethical review; Surveys and questionnairesen_US
dc.titleA Qualitative Research Survey on Cardiologist’s Ethical Stance in Cases of Moral Dilemmas in Cardiology Clinicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentTOBB ETÜen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181253233en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10728-023-00476-6-
dc.authorscopusid57216357055-
dc.authorscopusid36518584100-
dc.authorscopusid57243137300-
dc.authorscopusid57224971381-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept03.14. Department of Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

34
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.