Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIvanov, Zoran-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-23T06:07:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-23T06:07:23Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1306-9136-
dc.identifier.issn2791-9005-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.54842/ustich.1315682-
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1197209-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10920-
dc.description.abstractThe EU enlargement process has its dynamics throughout the years that still keep some of Balkan countries outside of its borders. Starting point for this analysis is perception matters. Hence, it aims to better understand the critical events from the history of interactions between EU and western part of Balkans that shaped the mutual perception that keep Balkan countries located in western part of the region away from the EU. The article will analyze both sides, the EU, and the countries of western part of Balkans. First, it argues that the policy of the EU enlargement with western Balkan has deep roots in history. Hence, we will identify manifests that shaped EU’s perceptions towards that region of Balkans. It will identify building blocks for enlargement resistance. Second, will scrutinize the unwillingness of the Balkan political elites to comply with accession criteria. Further, it will examine the internal regional manifests that contribute to the EU’s perception and undermine development and prosperity. Many regional politicians have mastered to talk the EU talk without delivering any genuine results. It will identify building blocks of stabilitocracy. At the end, it will give recommendations that are implied from the stalled process. Since EU membership is first responsibility than a privilege, priority should be given to what western Balkan countries can do for themselves. Only after they can attract the EU interests to open enlargement again.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUluslararası Suçlar ve Tarihen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleThe Eu - Balkans Enlargement Process Deadlock: The Role of Perceptions, Stabilitocracy, and Recommendationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentTOBB ETÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue24en_US
dc.identifier.startpage131en_US
dc.identifier.endpage153en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.identifier.doi10.54842/ustich.1315682-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1197209en_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept04.02. Department of International Entrepreneurship-
Appears in Collections:TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

74
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.