Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10774
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBakircioglu, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKolac, U.C.-
dc.contributor.authorYigit, Y.A.-
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, T.-
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, M.C.-
dc.contributor.authorYazici, M.-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, G.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T07:03:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-24T07:03:35Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn0271-6798-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002489-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10774-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The present study aims to investigate the frequency of recurrence and tethering effect after only metaphyseal screw removal (sleeper plate technique) compared with the conventional complete plate removal in the treatment of lower extremity deformities with guided growth surgery. Methods: Seventy-two patients (107 limbs) treated by an 8-plate hemiepiphysiodesis technique around the knee joint were evaluated. After the desired correction, only metaphyseal screw was removed (sleeper plate group) in 35 limbs (25 patients), whereas both screws and plate were removed (plate removal group) in 72 limbs (47 patients). An increase of 5 degrees or more in joint orientation angles in the direction of the initial deformity was considered as recurrence. The rate of rebound, tethering, and maintenance of correction in groups was analyzed at the latest follow-up (mean of 49 mo). Results: The mean age of the patients was 97 months (range: 80 to 129 mo) at the time of index surgery. After a mean of 49 months (range: 16 to 86), 17 (48.5%) limbs maintained the desired stable correction in the sleeper plate group compared with 59 stable limbs (72.2%) in the plate removal group (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference regarding recurrence between the sleeper plate group and the plate removal group (34.3% vs. 27.8%, respectively) (P=0.216). Reinsertion of the metaphyseal screw was possible 8/12 limbs, and the remaining 4 limbs underwent further surgeries. There were 6 limbs (17.3%) of tethering in the sleeper plate group, and 4/6 limbs required further corrective surgeries. The remaining 2 limbs with slight tethering did not require further surgeries. Conclusions: Removing only metaphyseal screw increases the risk of tethering. In addition, reinsertion of the screw may not be possible in all cases due to bony growth, and further corrective surgeries may be necessary. Close follow-up is required if the sleeper plate technique is to be applied. Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedicsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectguided growthen_US
dc.subjecthemiepiphysiodesisen_US
dc.subjectlower limben_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectchilden_US
dc.subjectcystinosisen_US
dc.subjectdysplasiaen_US
dc.subjectepiphysiodesisen_US
dc.subjectexostosisen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjecthemihypertrophyen_US
dc.subjecthemimeliaen_US
dc.subjecthereditary multiple exostosisen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectlimb deformityen_US
dc.subjectlower limben_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmetaphysisen_US
dc.subjectretrospective studyen_US
dc.subjectsleeper plate techniqueen_US
dc.subjectarthrodesisen_US
dc.subjectbone plateen_US
dc.subjectkneeen_US
dc.subjectlimben_US
dc.subjectplastic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectpostoperative complicationen_US
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.subjectArthrodesisen_US
dc.subjectBone Platesen_US
dc.subjectChilden_US
dc.subjectExtremitiesen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectKnee Jointen_US
dc.subjectPlastic Surgery Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Complicationsen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.titleDoes the Sleeper Plate Application for Temporary Epiphysiodesis Make Life Easier or Complicated? Increased Risk of Tetheringen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentTOBB ETÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage572en_US
dc.identifier.endpage577en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001081847800007en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85170581735en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.identifier.pmid37526124en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/BPO.0000000000002489-
dc.authorscopusid57204978474-
dc.authorscopusid58490414900-
dc.authorscopusid58198284100-
dc.authorscopusid57924892800-
dc.authorscopusid7103036510-
dc.authorscopusid7007162322-
dc.authorscopusid23500187200-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Sep 21, 2024

Page view(s)

42
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.