Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10739
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Asif, F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sultan, F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Masood, I. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Baig, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ekmecki, P.E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vaswani, V. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bhutta, Z. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-24T07:01:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-24T07:01:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0030-9982 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.8033 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10739 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To map literature on research ethics committees, institutional review boards and ethics review framework in Pakistan to identify key insights during public health emergencies and normal times. Method: The systematic scoping review was conducted in April 2022, and comprised literature search on PubMed, World Health Organisation Global Index Medicus and Summons databases for articles published between January 2005 and February 2022. Information extracted included authors names, year of publication, title, study methodology, and key insights under the heads of challenges and solutions. Due to data heterogeneity, key themes were identified and analysed. Results: Of the 2,190 studies initially identified, 21(0.95%) were subjected to full-Text review, and, from among them, 9(45%) were analysed in detail. There were 4 key insights identified: research ethics committees and institutional review boards in Pakistan remain unregulated as they are currently not registered or accredited by a competent national-level authority; most members of such committees are not formally trained to implement the mandate; internal and external pressures hinder independent decision-making of such committees; and other issues hindering the functionality and performance of research ethics committees and institutional review boards. Conclusion: Despite existing publications calling for urgent policy and regulatory reforms, there is a dearth of literature and minimal policy actions underlying the fact that ethics review remains a neglected area in Pakistan. © 2023 Pakistan Medical Association. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Approval by RECs/IRBs is still not mandatory for obtaining research funding from local sources | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Pakistan Medical Association | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Bioethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Ethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Ethics committees | en_US |
dc.subject | Institutional review board | en_US |
dc.subject | Pakistan | en_US |
dc.subject | bioethics | en_US |
dc.subject | decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | ethics | en_US |
dc.subject | human | en_US |
dc.subject | institutional review | en_US |
dc.subject | Medline | en_US |
dc.subject | Pakistan | en_US |
dc.subject | review | en_US |
dc.subject | systematic review | en_US |
dc.subject | World Health Organization | en_US |
dc.title | A Scoping Review of the Literature of Research Ethics Committees and Ethics Review Framework in Pakistan: What We Know and What We Still Need To Learn | en_US |
dc.type | Review | en_US |
dc.department | TOBB ETÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 73 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1667 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1674 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001083432300016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85165783896 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | … | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.47391/JPMA.8033 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 57210977965 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 57191952660 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 57205454815 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 58499063100 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 58505958500 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 6506006406 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 24342648300 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q4 | - |
item.openairetype | Review | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.