Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10293
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSinan, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaydam, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorOzer, MTen_US
dc.contributor.authorDemirbaş, Sezaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-21T11:01:31Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-21T11:01:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-01-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10293-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical studies indicate that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has many advantages over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC), such as improved cosmesis, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life, body image, and cosmesis between single-incision laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic approaches in patients undergoing cholecystectomies. Subjects and Methods: This retrospective study between SILC and CLC and was conducted among 58 patients undergoing SILC and CLC from January 2011 to March 2013 in Turkey. After the surgery, the EuroQol-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D™), and body image questionnaire (BIQ) were administered to the patients. Results: Differences between the early and late postoperative scores in the EQ-5D were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Differences between most BIQ areas favored SILC, especially regarding cosmesis (P = 0.016); SILC patients had higher satisfaction with their scar's appearance. Conclusion: SILC is a promising alternative to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in selected patients.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters-Kluweren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCholecystectomyen_US
dc.subjectComparisonen_US
dc.subjectCosmesisen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectSingle incisionen_US
dc.titleComparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Terms of Quality of Life, Body Image, and Cosmesisen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, School of Medicine, Department of General Surgeryen_US
dc.institutionauthorDemirbaş, Sezaien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_218_18-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.affiliationTOBB ETÜ Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Bl.en_US
dc.coverage.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_218_18en_US
dc.description.volume22en_US
dc.description.issue4en_US
dc.description.startpage521en_US
dc.description.endpage526en_US
item.openairetypeResearch Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept03.14. Department of Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü / Department of Surgical Sciences
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

108
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.